How do teams strategize for scoring during collaborations?

Teams strategize for scoring during collaborations primarily by analyzing the strengths of their opponents and alliances. This approach allows teams to understand the capabilities and weaknesses of not only their alliance partners but also their adversaries. By evaluating the tactical advantages or disadvantages they may have, teams can make informed decisions regarding which strategies to pursue during the match.

For instance, if a team recognizes that a specific opponent excels in a particular area, such as scoring efficiency or defensive maneuvers, they can adapt their own game plan to either counter that strength or reinforce their alliance in that area. This method supports collaborative efforts because it aligns the strategies of the team with those of their partners, optimizing their performance collectively.

In contrast, options such as analyzing referee decisions, guessing opponents' moves, or relying on audience feedback do not provide the same level of strategic depth. While understanding referee calls is valuable for compliance, it doesn’t directly influence scoring strategies. Guessing opponents' moves lacks the analytical foundation of understanding their strengths and weaknesses, making it a less reliable approach. Finally, audience feedback is generally subjective and does not offer actionable insights that can be used to shape in-game strategies effectively.